Coupled multi-model climate and climate suitability change predictions for major cassava growing regions of India under two representative concentration pathways

Coupled multi-model climate and climate suitability change predictions for major cassava growing regions of India under two representative concentration pathways

Authors

  • R. Shiny ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, (Research Centre, University of Kerala), Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695 017, India
  • J. Sreekumar ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, (Research Centre, University of Kerala), Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695 017, India
  • G. Byju ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, (Research Centre, University of Kerala), Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695 017, India

Keywords:

Cassava, Climate change, Climate suitability, Representative concentration pathways

Abstract

Changes in suitability of crops under climate change studies are a pre-requisite to achieve sustainable utilization of available land resources and to attain food security. This study attempts ensembled multimodel prediction of change in climate and climate suitability of cassava by 2030 and 2050 in major cassava growing regions of India under 4.5 and 8.5 representative concentration pathways (RCP). Suitability of cassava was modelled using EcoCrop model in Diva GIS 7.5. Climate and suitability changes were analysed using Diva GIS 7.5 and Arc GIS 10.1. The study showed a general warming of climate over the major cassava growing regions by 2030 and 2050 under RCPs 4.5 and 8.5. The mean temperature of major cassava growing regions in 2030 will increase by 1.18 - 1.550C and 1.29 - 1.490C for RCPs 4.5 and 8.5; and 1.62 - 1.780C and 2.03 - 2.280C for RCPs 4.5 and 8.5 in 2050. The precipitation in 2030 will increase by 13.57 - 92.40 mm and 25.27-103.70 mm for RCPs 4.5 and 8.5; and in 2050 it will change by -1.91 to 73.4mm and 5.31 to 56.60 mm for RCPs 4.5 and 8.5. The climate suitabilty will change by -1 to 8 % and -1.34 to 12.02 % in 2030 for RCPs 4.5 and 8.5; and -1.27 to 11.67% and -3.76 to 6.59% for RCPs 4.5 and 8.5 in 2050. Districts in Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh showing highest positive and negative impacts on climate suitability of cassava for RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 in 2030 and 2050 were identified. Districts showing no negative impact were also predicted. The results showed cassava’s comparative advantage in climate resilence compared to other major food crops such as rice and wheat.

Author Biographies

R. Shiny, ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, (Research Centre, University of Kerala), Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695 017, India

Research FellowICAR- Central Tuber Crops Research InstituteSreekariyam

J. Sreekumar, ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, (Research Centre, University of Kerala), Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695 017, India

Principal ScientistICAR- Central Tuber Crops Research InstituteSreekariyam

G. Byju, ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, (Research Centre, University of Kerala), Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695 017, India

Principal ScientistICAR- Central Tuber Crops Research InstituteSreekariyam

References

Aggarwal, P.K. 2008. Climate change: Implications for Indian agriculture. In: Lal, S.S. et al. (Eds.) Impact assessment of climate change for research priority planning in horticultural crops. Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, pp: 1–10.

Anupama, M. 2014. Climate change and its impacts on agriculture. Inter. J. Sci. Res. Publs.4: 2250-3153

Beebe, S., Ramirez, J., Jarvis, A., Rao, I. M., Mosquera, G., Bueno, J. M. and Blair, M. W. 2011. Genetic improvement of common beans and the challenges of climate change. Wiley and Sons. Chap. 16:176

Ceballos, H., Ramirez, J., Bellotti, A. C., Jarvis, A., Alvarez, E. 2011. Adaptation of cassava to changing climates. Crop adaptation to climate change. John Wiley and Sons Chap. 19.

Challinor, A. J., Simelton, E. S., Evan, D. G. F., Debbie, H. and Mathew, C. 2010. Increased crop failure due to climate change: assessing adaptation options using models and socio-economic data for wheat in China. Environ. Res. Lett 5: 8

Cock, J. H. 1983. Cassava symposium on potential productivity of field crops under different environments. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines. pp. 341-359.

Ekanayake, I. J., Okarter, U. C. and Adeleke, M. T. V. 1998. Dry season dust alters photosynthetic characteristics of field grown cassava in the dry season in two agroecozones of Nigeria. In. Root crops and poverty allevation. Eds. Akoroda, M.O. and Ekanayake, I. J. Pro. of Sixth Symp. of ISTRC-AB, Lilongwe, Malawi 402.

Fischer, G., Shah, M. and Velthuizen, H. van. 2002. Climate change and agricultural vulnerability. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Laxemburg, Austria.

Hijmans, R. J., Guarino, L., Cruz, M. and Rojas, E. 2001. Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS. Plant Genet Resour Newsl 127: 15–19

Hijmans, R. J. 2003. The effect of climate change on global potato production. Amer. J. Potato. Res. 80: 271-280.

Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P.G. and Jarvis, A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25:1965–1978

Hutchinson, M. F. and Hoog de, F.R. 1985. Smoothing noisy data with spline functions. Numer Math. 47: 99-106

Hutchinson, M. F. 1995. Interpolating mean rainfall using thin plate smoothing splines. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Syst. 9: 385–403

Intergovermental panel on climate change (IPCC). 2007. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate change 2007 (AR4). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.

Intergovermental panel on climate change (IPCC). 2014. Climate Change 2013. The physical science basis. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.

Intergovermental panel on climate change (IPCC). 2014. Climate change 2014. Synthesis Report. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.

Jarvis, A., Villegas, J. R., Herrera, C. B. V. and Navarro, R. C. 2012. Is cassava the answer to African climate change adaptation? Trop. Plant Bio. 5: 9-29

Katherine, R., Will, S., and Diana, Liverman. 2011. Climate change global risks, challenges and decision. Cambridge University Press pp. 224-225

Liu, J., Fritz, S., Van, C. F. A., Fuchs, M., You, L., Obersteiner, M. and Yang, H. 2008. A spatially explicit assessment of current and future hotspots of hunger in Sub-Saharan Africa in the context of global change. Glob. Planet Chang. 64: 222–235.

Lobell, D. B., Burke, M. B., Tebaldi, C., Mastrandrea, M. D., Falcon, W. P. and Naylor, R. L. 2008. Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319: 607–610.

Parry, M.L., Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A., Livermore, M., and Fischer. G. 2004. Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Glob. Environ. Change, 14: 53-67.

Piikki, K., Winowiecki, L., Vågen, T., Ramirez-Villegas, J. and Soderstrom M. 2017. Improvement of spatial modelling of crop suitability using a new digital soil map of Tranzania. South Afric. J. Plant Soil.34: 4

Pravat, J., Sarita, A. and Madhavan, N. R .2015. Statistical selection of the optimum model in the cmip5 dataset for climate change projections of indian monsoon rainfall. Climate. 3: 858-875.

Rosenzweig, C., and Parry, M. L. 1994. Potential impact of climate change on world food supply. Nature, 367 (6450): 133-138.

Sabitha, S., Byju, G. and Sreekumar, J. 2016. Projected changes in mean temperature and total precipitation and climate suitability of cassava (Manihot esculenta) in major growing environments of India. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 86 (5) : 647-653.

Schlenker, W. and Lobell, D. B. 2008. Robust negative impacts of climate change on African agriculture. Env. Res. Let. 5: 1-2.

Sin, C.C., Andre, L., Caroline, M., Claudine, D., Isabel, P., Jorge, G., Josiane, B., Priscila, T., Adan, S., Daniela, R., Diego, C., Gustavo, S., Gracielle, S. and Jose, M. 2014. Evaluation of the simulations nested in three global climate models assessment of climate hange over South America under RCP 4.5 and 8.5 downscaling scenarios. Amer. J. Clim. Change 3: 438-454.

Vermeulen, S. J., Challinor, A. J. and Thornton, P. K. 2013. Addressing uncertainty in adaptation planning for agriculture. Proc. of the Natl.l Aca. of Sci. of the U.S.A 110: 8357– 8362

Villegas, J. R., Jarvis, A. and Laderach, P. 2013. Empirical approaches for assessing impacts of climate change on agriculture: The EcoCrop model and a case study with grain sorghum. Agric. For. Met. 170: 67-78.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

07-02-2020

How to Cite

Shiny, R., Sreekumar, J., & Byju, G. (2020). Coupled multi-model climate and climate suitability change predictions for major cassava growing regions of India under two representative concentration pathways. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 57(2). Retrieved from https://jtropag.kau.in/index.php/ojs2/article/view/787

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...