Weed dynamics in crop+fish farming systems in summer fallow of double cropped lowland rice fields

Weed dynamics in crop+fish farming systems in summer fallow of double cropped lowland rice fields

Authors

  • M. Madankumar Kerala Agricultural University
  • Jacob John Kerala Agricultural University
  • P. Shalini Pillai Kerala Agricultural University
  • B. Rani Kerala Agricultural University

Keywords:

amaranthus, culinary melon, farming system, fish, fodder cowpea, lowland, rice, weed

Abstract

A field study was conducted in double cropped lowland rice fields during summer of 2016 to assess the crop performance and changes in weed species and weed population in different crop (amaranth, culinary melon, fodder cowpea) + fish (catla, rohu) farming systems vis-à-vis sole cropping. Productivity of culinary melon and amaranth was higher when integrated with fish compared to the sole crop. Culinary melon+fish system recorded the highest rice equivalent yield (REY). Among the weeds, grasses dominated followed by sedges and broad leaved weeds. Among grasses, population of Echinochloa colona was the highest followed by Isachne miliacea, Digitaria ciliaris and Eragrostis tenella. Among broad leaved weeds, Lindernia grandiflora ranked first followed by Phyllanthus niruri, Oldenlandia umbellata and Cleome rutidospermum. Among sedges, Fimbristylis miliacea outnumbered others. Lower weed dry matter production and higher weed control efficiency were observed when crops were integrated with fish. Culinary melon+fish system performed better in terms of weed control and productivity.

References

Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. 1965. Experimental design. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 225p.

Halwart, M. and Bartley, D. 2007. Aquatic biodiversity in rice-based ecosystems- Managing biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems. Columbia University Press, 492p.

John, J., Rajasekharan, P., Rajasree, G., and Bindu, P. 2014. Cropping Systems in Kerala. State Planning Board, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 46p.

KAU (Kerala Agricultural University) 2016. Package of Practices Recommendations: Crops (15th Ed.). Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, 393p.

Koocheki, A., Nassiri, M., Alimoradi, L. and Ghorbani, R. 2009. Effect of cropping systems and crop rotations on weeds. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29(2): 401-408.

Mani, V. S. and Gautham, K. G. 1973. Chemical weed control – effective and economical. Indian Farming 22: 21-22.

Murphy, C. E. and Lemerle, D. 2006. Continuous cropping systems and weed selection. Euphytica 148(1): 61-73.

Rao, A. N. and Nagamani, A. 2013. Eco-efficient weed management approaches for rice in tropical Asia. In: Proceedings 4th Tropical Weed Science Conference, 23-25 January 2013, Thailand. Weed Science Society of Thailand and Department of Agriculture, Thailand, pp.78-87.

Rothuis, A. J., Vromant, N., Xuan, V. T., Richter, C. J. J., and Ollevier, F. 1999. The effect of rice seeding rate on rice and fish production, and weed abundance in direct-seeded rice-fish culture. Aquac. 172 (4): 255-274.

Singh, A., Singh, R. K., Kumar, P. and Singh, S. 2013. Growth, weed control and yield of direct seeded rice as influenced by different herbicides. Indian J. Weed Sci. 45(4): 235-238.

Downloads

Published

18-07-2019

How to Cite

Madankumar, M., John, J., Pillai, P. S., & Rani, B. (2019). Weed dynamics in crop+fish farming systems in summer fallow of double cropped lowland rice fields. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 57(1). Retrieved from https://jtropag.kau.in/index.php/ojs2/article/view/687

Issue

Section

Short communications

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...