Defense mechanisms in Solanum virginianum against brinjal shoot and fruit borer -a comparative study

Defense mechanisms in Solanum virginianum against brinjal shoot and fruit borer -a comparative study

Authors

  • Neeraja Puthiamadom College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur 680 656, Kerala, India
  • Jiji Joseph College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur 680 656, Kerala, India
  • Madhu Subramanian College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur 680 656, Kerala, India
  • Pradeepkumar T. College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur 680 656, Kerala, India
  • Beena C. College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur 680 656, Kerala, India
  • Latha M. ICAR - NBPGR Regional Station, Thrissur 680 656, Kerala, India

Keywords:

Solanum virginiacum, morphological characterization, floral biology brinjal shoot and fruit borer, tolerant lines, Ponni

Abstract

A study was taken up to morphologically characterize Solanum virginianum accessions to identify suitable lines for resistance breeding. Four accessions of S. virginianum were evaluated along with S. melongena varieties ‘Ponni’ and ‘Surya’. Plants belonging to S. virginianum were prostrate growing and weedy in nature with strongly lobed leaves and small fruits bearing prickles. The plants of ‘Ponni’ and ‘Surya’ were erect growing with weakly lobed leaves and large sized fruits and were devoid of prickles. The accessions were screened for brinjal shoot and fruit borer infestation during August-November 2018 and March-July 2019 along with ‘Ponni’ and ‘Surya’. Shoot damage was not observed in the wild accessions during both the seasons. Variety ‘Ponni’ was highly susceptible as the shoot and fruit damage ranged from 13.33 to 54.16 per cent and 15.87 to 45.56 per cent, respectively. ‘Surya’ was more prone to damage by borer as the shoot and fruit damage ranged from 15.55 per cent to 54.17 per cent, and 16.58 per cent to 67.25 per cent, respectively. The plants belonging to S. virginianum were distinctly characterized by thick walled epidermis, thick cuticle and cortex wall, numerous trichomes, large number of well developed vascular bundles and small pith size. The susceptible varieties ‘Ponni’ and ‘Surya’ were characterized by thin walled epidermis, thin cuticle and cortex wall, very few trichomes, small number of poorly developed vascular bundles and large pith size. Hence, anatomical parameters viz., thickness of epidermis and cortex, trichome intensity, number and size of vascular bundles and pith size may serve as morphological markers, and S. virginianum could be a promising wild species in pre-breeding programmes as a suitable donor for fruit and shoot borer resistance. 

Author Biography

Jiji Joseph, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur 680 656, Kerala, India

Professor Dept. of Plant breeding and genetics COH, Vellanikkara

References

References

AL- Hubaity, A. I., Teli, J. A. 2014. Combining ability and heterosis in eggplant

(Solanum melongena L.). Mesopotamia J. of Agric. (41): 326-338.

Ali, A.; Khaliq, A., and Ashraf, M. 2012. Physical factors affecting resistance in cotton against jassid, Amrasca devastans and thrips. J. Agric. Res. 32:173-173.

Behera, T. K. and Singh, N. 2002. Inter-specific crosses between eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) with related Solanum species. Sci. Hort. 95: 165–172.

Chakraborti, S and Sarkar P, K. 2011. Management of Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee on Eggplants During the Rainy Season. India. J. Plant. Protec. Res. 51(4):325-328.

Doganlar, Anne, F., Marie ,C., Daunay, Richard, N., and Lester. 2002. A comparative genetic linkage map of egg plant (Solanum melongena) and its implication for genome evolution in the Solanaceae. Genetics. 161: 1713-1726.

Freeman, B.C. and Beattie, G. A. 2008. An Overview of Plant Defenses against Pathogens and Herbivores. The Plant Health Instructor. DOI: 10.1094/PHI-I-2008-0226-01. 18p.

Gepts. 2003. Domestication as a long term selection experiment. Plant Breeding Reviews. 24(2): 1-4.

Guarino, L., and Lobell, D.B. 2011. A walk on the wild side. Nature Climate Change 1: 374– 375.

Gunjeet, K., Meena, B. L., Kar, S. K., Tiwari, P. K., Gangopadhyay, S. K., Bisht, I. S. et al. 2008. Morphological diversity in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) germplasm accessions. Plant Genetic Resources. 6(3):232-2.

IPGRI. 1988. Descriptors for eggplant. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome. pp. 1-23.

Kavitha J. 2004. Bioactivity guided Isolated and Evaluation of Anti- allergic activity of Solanum nigrumand Solanum xanthocarpum Liin. Berries. Int. J. Bot. 12:15-19.

Kumar, S. and Singh, D. 2013. Seasonal incidence and economic losses of brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee. Agric. Sci. Digest. 33(2):98- 103.

Mutegi , E. , Snow , A. A., Rajkumar, M. , Pasquet , R., Ponniah, H. , Daunay , M. C and Davidar, P. 2015. Genetic diversity and population structure of wild/weedy eggplant ( Solanum insanum , Solanaceae) in southern India: Implications for conservation. American J. Bot. 102: 139 – 14.

Nandi, C., Gangadhar, N., Sanjeev, J., and Prafulkumar, M. V. 2017. Seasonal Incidence of Brinjal Shoot and Fruit Borer, Leucinodes orbonalis Guene, (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) During Kharif Season. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 6(12): 1088-1093.

Naujeer, H. B. 2009. Morphological diversity in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.), their related species and wild types conserved at the National gene bank in Mauritius. M. Sc thesis. Swedish Biodiversity Centre. 74p.

Neeraja, P. 2017. Flowering behaviour in different species of solanum Int. J. Ag. Sci and Res. 7(4): 59-64.

Neeraja, P. 2017. Palynology and mode of pollination in different species of solanum. Int. J. Ag. Sci and Res. 7(5): 45-50.

Norris., Dale, M., and Kogan, M.1980. Biochemical and morphological basis of resistance to insect pests. Nature . 125: 411-412.

Oyelana, O. and Oguwenmo, O. K. 2012. Floral biology and the effects of plant- pollinator interaction on pollination intensity, fruit and seed set in Solanum. Afric. J. Biot. 11(84): 14967-14981.

Pal, B. P., and Singh, H. B. 1943. Floral characters and fruit formation in the egg plant. I. J. Genet. 3(1): 45-58.

Prasad, M. K. and Krishnaprasad, M. 1994. Outlines of microtechniques. Emkey Publishers, New Delhi, 103p.

Radford, A. E., Dickson, W. C., Massery, J. R., and Ritchiebell. 1984. Vascular plant systematics. Harper and Raw publishers, New York, 891p.

Sahu, R., Ashwani, K., Hadi, H. K, Dharmveer, H., Narendra, S., and Huma Naz. 2018. Seasonal incidence of Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee in Allahabad, U.P., India The Pharma Innovation Journal . 7(1): 79-82.

Scott, L. 1999. Environmental significance of anthocyanins in plant stress responses. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 70: 1–9. doi:10.1111/php.1999.70.issue-1.

Sękara, A and Bieniasz, M. 2008. Pollination, fertilization and fruit formation in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Acta Agrobotanica. 61: 107−113.

Subbaratnam, G.V. and Butani, D. K. 1981. Screening of eggplant varieties for resistant to insect pest complex. Vegetable Sci. 8: 149-153.

Vorontsova, M. S., Stern, S., Bohs, S., and Knapp, S. 2013. African spiny Solanum (subgenus Leptostemonum, Solanaceae): a thorny phylogenetic tangle. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 173: 176–193.

Zehnder. 2010. Host Plant Resistance and Tolerance to Insect Pests. Eorganic https://eorganic.org/node/2564.

Downloads

Published

28-07-2021

How to Cite

Puthiamadom, N., Joseph, J., Subramanian, M., T., P., C., B., & M., L. (2021). Defense mechanisms in Solanum virginianum against brinjal shoot and fruit borer -a comparative study. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 59(1). Retrieved from https://jtropag.kau.in/index.php/ojs2/article/view/986

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...